Julius Caesar Essays - Cultural Depictions Of Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar 9-K In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators. Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who, he later says, will benefit as freeman with Caesar's death. This shows that Brutus knows how to lure the crowd, appealing to their better judgement as Romans. He declares that he is an honorable man, and tells them that he will let them judge th e validity of his claims. That is, he will allow the truth to speak for itself. This encourages the crowd to believe him, as an honorable man. He says that he wants them to know the facts; "Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses that you may the better judge." Sharing information with the people is flattering and it almost guarantees acceptance. He gets their sympathy by saying that he loved Caesar, daring the people to find anyone who loved Caesar more. Brutus declares that he never wronged Caesar, that he cried for Caesar's love, was happy for his greatness, honored him for his courage, but had to kill him because of Caesar's ambition. He says that the reason for killing Caesar was his great love for Rome. He justifies his actions by saying that he loved Caesar but, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." He then asks rhetorically if the people would want to live their lives as slaves under Caesar's rule or would they prefer to live as freemen with Caesar dead. To anyone insulted by his speech he wonders if, as Romans who love their freedom, they could be offended or reject what he, Brutus, says. He poses the question, "Who is here so base that would be a bondman?" He stresses the point, repeating the line, "If any, speak, for him have I offended." "I pause for a reply.", allows them to respond to his rhetorical questions, giving them an even greater sense that he cares about them and their opinions. They can only respond, " None, Brutus, none." That is, none are offended, they do not disagree or argue with his words or his actions. Mark Antony's eulogy utilizes a different approach. He starts out by addressing the crowd as "Friends" because he wants to come to them as a friend rather than a ruler trying to gain power. He then says, "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.", thus he can ease in praises of Caesar without the crowd stopping him. He sounds very sincere when he says, "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious.... For Brutus is an honorable man." He repeats that statement three more times becoming increasingly sarcastic, saying finally, "Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and sure he was an honorable man." Since the people responded positively to Brutus' speech, Antony could not insult Brutus' honesty in a direct manner. Yet, Antony disproves Caesar's ambition with three examples. One is when he gave the ransom of captives to the public treasury and not his own, another when he cried with the poor people, and finally when he refused the kingship that Antony offered him, three times. Anyone who was ambitious would never have done any such things. Antony says, "I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke." , but that is exactly what he does. Antony is using a dramatic effect on the people, first by entering on the stage with the body of Caesar, and at the end stating that his heart is still with the body of Caesar, ending his speech weeping. In justifying Caesar and disproving Br utus, the people see Antony as a potential successor to Caesar. They are swayed to

Permitir Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, Examples

Permitir Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, Examples The Spanish verb permitir  means to permit or to allow. Conjugate permitir  like any other regular  -ir  verb, such as  compartir and  escribir. This article includes tables with the conjugations for permitir  in  the present, preterite, imperfect, future, periphrastic future, and conditional indicative, the present and past subjunctive, the imperative, and other verb forms such as the present participle (to form progressive verb forms) and the past participle (to form compound verb forms). Permitir Present Indicative Yo permito I allow Yo permito que mi hermano use mi ropa. T permites You allow T permites el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella permite You/he/she allows Ella no permite entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros permitimos We allow Nosotros permitimos que lleguen tarde a la reunin. Vosotros permits You allow Vosotros permits usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas permiten You/they allow Ellos no permiten tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Preterite  Indicative There are two different past tenses in Spanish. The preterite tense is equivalent to the English simple past, and it is used to talk about completed actions in the past.  Ã‚   Yo permit I allowed Yo permit que mi hermano usara mi ropa. T permitiste You allowed T permitiste el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella permiti You/he/she allowed Ella no permiti entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros permitimos We allowed Nosotros permitimos que llegaran tarde a la reunin. Vosotros permitisteis You allowed Vosotros permitisteis usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas permitieron You/they allowed Ellos no permitieron tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Imperfect  Indicative The imperfect tense can be translated to English as was allowing or used to allow,  and it  is used to give descriptions and background information, and to talk about ongoing or habitual actions in the past.   Yo permita I used to allow Yo permita que mi hermano usara mi ropa. T permitas You used to allow T permitas el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella permita You/he/she used to allow Ella no permita entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros permitamos We used to allow Nosotros permitamos que llegaran tarde a la reunin. Vosotros permitais You used to allow Vosotros permitais usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas permitan You/they used to allow Ellos no permitan tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Future  Indicative The future tense is formed by adding the future endings (à ©, s, , emos, à ©is, n) to the infinitive form of the verb,  permitir. Yo permitir I will allow Yo permitir que mi hermano use mi ropa. T permitirs You will allow T permitirs el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella permitir You/he/she will allow Ella no permitir entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros permitiremos We will allow Nosotros permitiremos que lleguen tarde a la reunin. Vosotros permitiris You will allow Vosotros permitiris usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas permitirn You/they will allow Ellos no permitirn tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Periphrastic Future  Indicative The periphrastic future tense is composed of  three different parts: the present indicative conjugation of the verb  ir  (to go), the preposition  a,  and the infinitive of the verb. Yo voy a permitir I am going to allow Yo voy a permitir que mi hermano use mi ropa. T vas a permitir You are going to allow T vas a permitir el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella va a permitir You/he/she is going to allow Ella no va a permitir entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros vamos a permitir We are going to allow Nosotros vamos a permitir que lleguen tarde a la reunin. Vosotros vais a permitir You are going to allow Vosotros vais a permitir usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas van a permitir You/they are going to allow Ellos no van a permitir tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Conditional  Indicative The conditional tense is formed by adding the proper ending (à ­a, à ­as, à ­a, à ­amos, à ­ais, à ­an) to the infinitive form of the verb. Yo permitira I would allow Yo permitira que mi hermano use mi ropa. T permitiras You would allow T permitiras el uso del telfono en la clase. Usted/l/ella permitira You/he/she would allow Ella no permitira entregar la tarea tarde. Nosotros permitiramos We would allow Nosotros permitiramos que lleguen tarde a la reunin. Vosotros permitirais You would allow Vosotros permitirais usar ropa informal en la oficina. Ustedes/ellos/ellas permitiran You/they would allow Ellos no permitiran tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Present Progressive/Gerund Form To form progressive tenses such as  the present progressive,  you need to first conjugate the verb estar  in the present indicative tense, and follow it with the present participle (gerundio  in Spanish). The present participle for -ir verbs is formed with the ending  -iendo. Present Progressive of Permitir est permitiendo She is allowing Ella no est permitiendo  entregar la tarea tarde. Permitir Past Participle To form compound tenses such as the present perfect, you first need to conjugate the verb haber  in the present indicative tense, and follow it with the past participle. The past participle of -ir verbs is formed with the ending -ido.   Present Perfect of Permitir   ha permitido   She has allowed   Ella no ha permitido entregar la tarea tarde.   Permitir Present Subjunctive The subjunctive mood is used in a subordinate clause when the main clause of a sentence expresses doubt, emotion, desires, recommendations, possibilities, or other subjective situations. Que yo permita That I allow Mam quiere que yo permita que mi hermano use mi ropa. Que t permitas That you allow Pedro quiere que t permitas el uso del telfono en la clase. Que usted/l/ella permita That you/he/she allow La directora sugiere que ella no permita entregar la tarea tarde. Que nosotros permitamos That we allow Eric quiere que nosotros permitamos que lleguen tarde a la reunin. Que vosotros permitis That you allow Ana quiere que vosotros permitis usar ropa informal en la oficina. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas permitan That you/they allow El jefe pide que ellos no permitan tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Imperfect  Subjunctive In Spanish there are two  ways to conjugate the imperfect subjunctive. Both forms are equally accepted. Option 1 Que yo permitiera That I allowed Mam quera que yo permitiera que mi hermano usara mi ropa. Que t permitieras That you allowed Pedro quera que t permitieras el uso del telfono en la clase. Que usted/l/ella permitiera That you/he/she allowed La directora sugera que ella no permitiera entregar la tarea tarde. Que nosotros permitiramos That we allowed Eric quera que nosotros permitiramos que llegaran tarde a la reunin. Que vosotros permitierais That you allowed Ana quera que vosotros permitierais usar ropa informal en la oficina. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas permitieran That you/they allowed El jefe pidi que ellos no permitieran tomar muchas vacaciones. Option 2 Que yo permitiese That I allowed Mam quera que yo permitiese que mi hermano usase mi ropa. Que t permitieses That you allowed Pedro quera que t permitieses el uso del telfono en la clase. Que usted/l/ella permitiese That you/he/she allowed La directora sugera que ella no permitiese entregar la tarea tarde. Que nosotros permitisemos That we allowed Eric quera que nosotros permitisemos que llegasen tarde a la reunin. Que vosotros permitieseis That you allowed Ana quera que vosotros permitieseis usar ropa informal en la oficina. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas permitiesen That you/they allowed El jefe pidi que ellos no permitiesen tomar muchas vacaciones. Permitir Imperative   The imperative mood is used to give orders or commands. Notice that there is some variation between the positive and negative commands.   Positive Commands T permite Allow! Permite el uso del telfono en la clase! Usted permita Allow! Permita entregar la tarea tarde! Nosotros permitamos Lets allow! Permitamos que lleguen tarde a la reunin! Vosotros permitid Allow! Permitid usar ropa informal en la oficina! Ustedes permitan Allow! Permitan tomar muchas vacaciones! Negative Commands T no permitas Dont allow! No permitas el uso del telfono en la clase! Usted no permita Dont allow!! No permita entregar la tarea tarde! Nosotros no permitamos Lets not allow! No permitamos que lleguen tarde a la reunin! Vosotros no permitis Dont allow! No permitis usar ropa informal en la oficina! Ustedes no permitan Dont allow! No permitan tomar muchas vacaciones!

LLB Law Of Evidence coursework Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

LLB Law Of Evidence coursework - Essay Example On the other hand, the defendant can easily claim that they did not have knowledge of what was inside the package, but that the package contained other things, something hard for the prosecutor to rebut. The aim of this paper is to advise Jim who is appealing against his conviction for supply heroin based on evidential issues arising from the judge’s summing up. Discussion Ever since the effecting of Human Rights Act 1998, criminal evidence has become the most significant development due to various disputes under Article 6 which entails the right to a just trial against the application of a legal weight on the defendant to establish one or more particulars in the issue2. The fact that Jim is seeking a declaration that section 28(3) (b) (i) to be declared contrary to Human Rights Act 1998 as it infringes on his right to a just trial under Article 6 of European Convention on Human Rights 1950, he is placing the court with a question on whether it has the jurisdiction to consider appeal and, if it did, whether section 28(3) (b) (i) the Act was unsuited with his right to a just trial3. ... Therefore, in order to establish the defence under section 28(3) of the Act, Jim has to prove on the equilibrium of probabilities that he did not know that the box contained heroin4. The real apprehension is not if the defendant should disprove evidence but that the defendant may be convicted though a reasonable doubt subsists. In particular, the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 does not have a clear characterization of possession, and in section 37(3) it elaborates that an item which an individual has in his or her possession to include anything subject to his or her control, and which is in the guardianship of another person. Therefore, unless the item is in that individual control though still under care of another person, it cannot be categorized to be in the accused in this case Jim possession5. This then leads to what the directions the jury was given by the trial judge, and it is evident that though it was essential for the prosecution to establish that Jim knew that the box was in hi s control, it was not essential for the prosecution to establish that Jim knew that the item inside the box was a controlled drug. For this reason, then there would be the likelihood of an infringement in terms of presumption of innocence. This became evident in R v Edwards,6 whereby the defence was identified to have so closely associated with the mens rea principle and moral guilt that it derogated from presupposition to reassignment of legal burden to the defendant. Although subsections (2) with (3) of Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 define specifically of the defendant proving something, then this does not necessarily mean that in order to ascertain a defence then the defendant must essentially offer evidence. Thus, the essential evidence might arise such as from any varied